You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience and security.

INDICATION: LUPKYNIS is indicated in combination with a background immunosuppressive therapy regimen for the treatment of adult patients with active lupus nephritis (LN).

Limitations of Use: Safety and efficacy of LUPKYNIS have not been established in combination with cyclophosphamide. Use of LUPKYNIS is not recommended in this situation.

About Lupus Nephritis (LN)

LN Is Among the Most Severe and Dangerous Complications of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)1,2

SLE Affects Approximately 200,000 to 300,000 Patients in the United States7-11

ONLY

42%

of patients with SLE are screened for LN12,a

UP TO

60%

of patients with SLE develop LN13

87%

of patients with LN are class III, IV, or V2

ONLY

42%

of patients with SLE are screened for LN12,a

UP TO

60%

of patients with SLE develop LN13

87%

of patients with LN are class III, IV, or V2

By the time LN is diagnosed, irreversible kidney damage may already be present.14

UP TO

30%

of patients with LN progress to end-stage

renal disease within 15 years of diagnosis3

45x

increased risk of kidney failure once

diagnosed with LN2,b,c

32.8

YEARS

mean age of patients with LN who

submitted to kidney transplantation15

aPatients with SLE without LN.

bAs compared with patients with SLE without LN.2

cAnalysis of Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics inception cohort of newly diagnosed patients enrolled between 1999 and 2012, who were followed for a mean of 4.6 years. A total of 1827 patients were recruited, of whom 700 had LN over the course of follow-up.2

Proteinuria Is a Significant Risk Factor for Kidney Damage16,17

Even low levels of proteinuria may be associated with significant kidney damage14

  • Patients with proteinuria <0.5 g/day had a median chronicity index of 2 (range: 0-4)14
  • Proteinuria level at 12 months is a predictor of long-term renal outcomes18,d
    • Levels of proteinuria 0.5-0.8 g/day predict long-term renal outcomes, including 15-year CKD-free survival18-20

Did you know? Even mild clinical presentations (eg, subnephrotic proteinuria) can be associated with active histological lesions21,22

Nearly 90%

of patients with proteinuria <0.5 g/day have been reported to have class III or IV (±V) LN on biopsy14

Histologic Findings at Biopsy in Patients With SLE14,e-g

Even a Single Flare of LN Can Reduce the Lifespan of the Kidney6

Nephron Loss and LN

Adapted with permission from Anders HJ et al. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2020;6(1):7.

  • A single flare of LN can cause irreversible nephron loss, potentially shortening the lifespan of the kidneys by decades6
  • Every subsequent flare contributes to the accrual of kidney damage, further shortening kidney lifespan and increasing the risk of adverse long-term outcomes such as ESKD6
  • Nephron loss and podocyte damage often lead to protein leakage into the urine6,23
  • Proteinuria as a marker of kidney damage routinely precedes eGFR decline6,16

Early and definitive treatment is crucial to preserving nephron loss6

dRetrospective analysis conducted to determine if proteinuria was a good predictor of renal outcomes in a racially diverse group of patients with severe LN. A total of 107 patients with biopsy-proven LN with at least 7 years of available longitudinal follow-up data were selected for the study, of which 94 patients diagnosed with end-stage renal disease after the first year of follow-up were enrolled. Poor long-term renal outcome was defined as serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL at the 7-year follow-up, and good renal outcome was serum creatinine <1.5 mg/dL. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess renal survival using the proposed proteinuria cutoff of <0.8 g/24 hours at 12 months.18

eFrom a study of 222 patients with SLE who underwent kidney biopsy for suspicion of LN.14

fPercentage of patients with ISN/RPS class III or IV (± V), or V with proteinuria <0.5 g/day calculation: ([14 + 21 + 2 + 4 + 0]/46) x 100 = 89.1%.14

gPercentage of patients with ISN/RPS class III or IV (± V), or V with proteinuria ≥0.5 g/day calculation: ([18 + 135 + 3 + 19]/176) x 100 = 99.4%.14

Proteinuria Reduction Is Associated With Long-Term Renal Protection24

The larger the initial reduction in proteinuria in the first several months of management, the lower the risk of ESKD24

Kidney Survival Based on Proteinuria Response Status24,h

Adapted with permission from Chen YE et al. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2008;3(1):46-53.

The Need Remains for Additional Treatment Options5

MMF + Steroids Induction Response at 24 Weeks25,i,j

MMF + steroidsk alone frequently fail to substantially reduce proteinuria, with only 20%-30% of patients achieving a complete response at 1-2 years5,26

hRetrospective analysis of patients (N=86) enrolled in the prospective controlled trial of plasmapheresis in severe LN to determine long-term prognosis of achieving partial response. Complete response was defined as SCr ≤1.4 mg/dL and proteinuria ≤0.33 g/day within 5 years of study entry, and partial response was defined as ≤25% increase in baseline SCr and ≥50% reduction in baseline proteinuria to ≤1.5 g/day (but >0.33 g/day) within 5 years of entering the study. Kidney survival was determined by kidney failure (≥6 mg/dL SCr or the initiation of kidney replacement therapy).24

iPercentage of patients with partial response calculations: 56.2% – 8.6% = 47.6%.25

jPercentage of patients with no response calculations: 100% – 56.2% = 43.8%.25

kIn the Aspreva Lupus Management Study, MMF (data presented here) and intravenous cyclophosphamide (data not shown) were compared, both with steroids, as induction treatment in patients with class III, IV, and V LN (N=370). Primary endpoint was response at 24 weeks. Response was defined as a decrease in UPCR to <3 mg/mg in patients with baseline nephrotic proteinuria (≥3 mg/mg), or by ≥50% in patients with subnephrotic baseline proteinuria (<3 mg/mg), and stabilization (±25%) or improvement in SCr as adjudicated by a blinded Clinical Endpoints Committee. Complete response was a secondary endpoint defined as return to normal SCr, urine protein ≤0.5 g/day, and inactive urinary sediment (≤5 WBC/hpf and ≤5 RBC/hpf, and a reading of lower than 2+ on dipstick and absence of red cell casts).25

Guideline Recommendations for LN

Vigilance Around Suspected Kidney Involvement

Strive for early LN identification, given the repercussions of delaying diagnosis

At every visit, implement vigilant screening and monitoring for kidney involvement

Once identified, consider early intervention with multitarget treatment regimen

Management Goals to Optimize Kidney Function

Treat to targetl:

  • Reduce proteinuria by ≥25% at 3 months and ≥50% at 6 months
  • Reduce urine protein <0.5-0.7 g/day at 12-24 months

Reduce steroid exposure: Quickly taper steroid dose to ≤5 mg/day

Management should be continued once complete response is achieved for at least 3 years

EULAR Guidelines: Recommended Management Targets for LN5

lAll with eGFR within 10% of baseline.5

ACR=American College of Rheumatology; CKD=chronic kidney disease; eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESKD=end-stage kidney disease; EULAR=European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology; hpf=high-power field; ISN/RPS=International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society; MMF=mycophenolate mofetil; RBC=red blood cell; SCr=serum creatinine; SLE=systemic lupus erythematosus; UPCR=urine protein-to-creatinine ratio; WBC=white blood cell.

References: 1. Yurkovich M, Vostretsova K, Chen W, Aviña-Zubieta JA. Overall and cause-specific mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66(4):608-616. 2. Hanly JG, O’Keeffe AG, Su L, et al. The frequency and outcome of lupus nephritis: results from an international inception cohort study. Rheumatol. 2016;55(2):252-262. 3. Bertsias GK, Tektonidou M, Amoura Z, et al. Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(11):1771-1782. 4. Hermansen ML, Jesper Lindhardsen J, Torp-Pedersen C, Faurschou M, and Jacobsen S. The risk of cardiovascular morbidity and cardiovascular mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: a Danish nationwide population-based cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56(5):709-715. 5. Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Andersen J, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024;83(1):15-29. 6. Anders HJ, Saxena R, Zhao M, Parodis I, Salmon JE, Mohan C. Lupus nephritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):7. 7. Lim SS, Bayakly AR, Helmick CG, Gordon C, Easley K, Drenkard C. The incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus, 2002–2004: The Georgia Lupus Registry. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(2):357-368. 8. Somers EC, Marder W, Cagnoli P, et al. Population-based incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus: The Michigan Lupus Epidemiology and Surveillance Program. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(2):369-378. 9. Izmirly PM, Wan I, Sahl S, et al. The incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus in New York County (Manhattan), New York. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(10):2006–2017. 10. Izmirly PM, Parton H, Wang L, et al. Prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus in the United States: estimates from a meta-analysis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention national lupus registries. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73(6):991-996. 11. Dall’Era M, Cisternas MG, Snipes K, Herrinton LJ, Gordon C, Helmick CG. The incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus in San Francisco County, California: The California Lupus Surveillance Project. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(10):1996-2005. 12. Aggarwal I, Li J, Trupin L, et al. Quality of care for the screening, diagnosis, and management of lupus nephritis across multiple healthcare settings. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020;72(7):888-896. 13. KDIGO Lupus Nephritis Work Group. KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the management of lupus nephritis. Kidney Int. 2024;105(1S):S1-S69. 14. De Rosa M, Rocha AS, De Rosa G, Dubinsky D, Almaani SJ, Rovin BH. Low-grade proteinuria does not exclude significant kidney injury in lupus nephritis. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5(7):1066-1068. 15. Albuquerque BC, Salles VB, de Paulo Tajra RD, Rodrigues CEM. Outcome and prognosis of patients with lupus nephritis submitted to renal transplantation. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11611. 16. Cravedi P, Remuzzi G. Pathophysiology of proteinuria and its value as an outcome measure in chronic kidney disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;76(4):516-523. 17. Koo HS, Kim S, Chin HJ. Remission of proteinuria indicates good prognosis in patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. Lupus. 2016;25(1):3-11. 18. Ugolini-Lopes MR, Seguro LPC, Castro MXF, et al. Early proteinuria response: a valid real-life situation predictor of long-term lupus renal outcome in an ethnically diverse group with severe biopsy-proven nephritis? Lupus Sci Med. 2017;4(1):e000213. 19. Tamirou F, Lauwerys BR, Dall’Era M, et al. A proteinuria cut-off level of 0.7 g/day after 12 months of treatment best predicts long-term renal outcome in lupus nephritis: data from the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial. Lupus Sci Med. 2015;2(1):e000123. 20. Moroni G, Gatto M, Tamborini F, et al. Lack of EULAR/ERA-EDTA response at 1 year predicts poor long-term renal outcome in patients with lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(8):1077-1083. 21. Ding JYC, Ibañez D, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB. Isolated hematuria and sterile pyuria may indicate systemic lupus erythematosus activity. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(3):437-440. 22. Christopher-Stine L, Siedner M, Lin J, et al. Renal biopsy in lupus patients with low levels of proteinuria. J Rheumatol. 2007,34(2):332-335. 23. Maria NI, Davidson A. Protecting the kidney in systemic lupus erythematosus: from diagnosis to therapy. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16(5):255-267. 24 Chen YE, Korbet SM, Katz RS, Schwartz MM, Lewis EJ, for the Collaborative Study Group. Value of a complete or partial remission in severe lupus nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(1):46-53. 25. Appel GB, Contreras G, Dooley MA, et al, and the Aspreva Lupus Management Study Group. Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for induction treatment of lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(5):1103-1112. 26. Saxena A, Ginzler EM, Gibson K, et al. Safety and efficacy of long-term voclosporin treatment for lupus nephritis in the phase 3 AURORA 2 clinical trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024;76(1):59-67. 27. 2024 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Guideline for the Screening, Treatment, and Management of Lupus Nephritis: Guideline Summary. American College of Rheumatology. November 18, 2024. Accessed November 18, 2024.

Connect with an Aurinia representative.
Sign up for the latest news, updates, and materials for LUPKYNIS.

GET CONNECTED

Indication

LUPKYNIS is indicated in combination with a background immunosuppressive therapy regimen for the treatment of adult patients with active lupus nephritis (LN).

Limitations of Use: Safety and efficacy of LUPKYNIS have not been established in combination with cyclophosphamide. Use of LUPKYNIS is not recommended in this situation.

Important Safety Information

BOXED WARNINGS: MALIGNANCIES AND SERIOUS INFECTIONS

Increased risk for developing malignancies and serious infections with LUPKYNIS or other immunosuppressants that may lead to hospitalization or death.

CONTRAINDICATIONS: LUPKYNIS is contraindicated in patients taking strong CYP3A4 inhibitors because of the increased risk of acute and/or chronic nephrotoxicity, and in patients who have had a serious/severe hypersensitivity reaction to LUPKYNIS or its excipients.

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Lymphoma and Other Malignancies: Immunosuppressants, including LUPKYNIS, increase the risk of developing lymphomas and other malignancies, particularly of the skin. The risk appears to be related to increasing doses and duration of immunosuppression rather than to the use of any specific agent.

Serious Infections: Immunosuppressants, including LUPKYNIS, increase the risk of developing bacterial, viral, fungal, and protozoal infections, including opportunistic infections which lead to serious, including fatal outcomes.

Nephrotoxicity: LUPKYNIS, like other calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), may cause acute and/or chronic nephrotoxicity. The risk is increased when CNIs are concomitantly administered with drugs associated with nephrotoxicity. Monitor eGFR regularly.

Hypertension: Hypertension is a common adverse reaction of LUPKYNIS therapy and may require antihypertensive therapy. Monitor blood pressure regularly.

Neurotoxicity: LUPKYNIS, like other CNIs, may cause a spectrum of neurotoxicities: severe include posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), delirium, seizure, and coma; others include tremor, paresthesia, headache, and changes in mental status and/or motor and sensory functions. Monitor for neurologic symptoms.

Hyperkalemia: Hyperkalemia, which may be serious and require treatment, has been reported with CNIs, including LUPKYNIS. Concomitant use of agents associated with hyperkalemia may increase the risk for hyperkalemia. Monitor serum potassium levels periodically.

QTc Prolongation: LUPKYNIS prolongs the QTc interval in a dose‑dependent manner when dosed higher than the recommended lupus nephritis therapeutic dose. The use of LUPKYNIS in combination with other drugs that are known to prolong QTc may result in clinically significant QT prolongation.

Immunizations: Avoid the use of live attenuated vaccines during treatment with LUPKYNIS. Inactivated vaccines noted to be safe for administration may not be sufficiently immunogenic during treatment with LUPKYNIS.

Pure Red Cell Aplasia: Cases of pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) have been reported in patients treated with another CNI immunosuppressant. If PRCA is diagnosed, consider discontinuation of LUPKYNIS.

Drug‑Drug Interactions: Avoid co‑administration of LUPKYNIS and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or with strong or moderate CYP3A4 inducers. Co‑administration of LUPKYNIS with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors is contraindicated. Reduce LUPKYNIS dosage when co‑administered with moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors. Avoid use of LUPKYNIS with strong or moderate CYP3A4 inducers.

ADVERSE REACTIONS

The most common adverse reactions (≥3%) were glomerular filtration rate decreased, hypertension, diarrhea, headache, anemia, cough, urinary tract infection, abdominal pain upper, dyspepsia, alopecia, renal impairment, abdominal pain, mouth ulceration, fatigue, tremor, acute kidney injury, and decreased appetite.

SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

Pregnancy: Avoid use of LUPKYNIS.

Lactation: Consider the mother’s clinical need of LUPKYNIS and any potential adverse effects to the breastfed infant when prescribing LUPKYNIS to a lactating woman.

Renal Impairment: LUPKYNIS is not recommended in patients with baseline eGFR ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m2 unless benefit exceeds risk. If used in this population, reduce LUPKYNIS dose.

Hepatic Impairment: For mild or moderate hepatic impairment, reduce LUPKYNIS dose. Avoid use with severe hepatic impairment.

Please see full Prescribing Information including Boxed Warning and Medication Guide for additional Important Safety Information about LUPKYNIS.

Important Safety Information

BOXED WARNINGS: MALIGNANCIES AND SERIOUS INFECTIONS

Increased risk for developing malignancies and serious infections with LUPKYNIS or other immunosuppressants that may lead to hospitalization or death.

CONTRAINDICATIONS: LUPKYNIS is contraindicated in patients taking strong CYP3A4 inhibitors because of the increased risk of acute and/or chronic nephrotoxicity, and in patients who have had a serious/severe hypersensitivity reaction to LUPKYNIS or its excipients.

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

Lymphoma and Other Malignancies: Immunosuppressants, including LUPKYNIS, increase the risk of developing lymphomas and other malignancies, particularly of the skin. The risk appears to be related to increasing doses and duration of immunosuppression rather than to the use of any specific agent.

Serious Infections: Immunosuppressants, including LUPKYNIS, increase the risk of developing bacterial, viral, fungal, and protozoal infections, including opportunistic infections which lead to serious, including fatal outcomes.

Nephrotoxicity: LUPKYNIS, like other calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), may cause acute and/or chronic nephrotoxicity. The risk is increased when CNIs are concomitantly administered with drugs associated with nephrotoxicity. Monitor eGFR regularly.

Hypertension: Hypertension is a common adverse reaction of LUPKYNIS therapy and may require antihypertensive therapy. Monitor blood pressure regularly.

Neurotoxicity: LUPKYNIS, like other CNIs, may cause a spectrum of neurotoxicities: severe include posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), delirium, seizure, and coma; others include tremor, paresthesia, headache, and changes in mental status and/or motor and sensory functions. Monitor for neurologic symptoms.

Hyperkalemia: Hyperkalemia, which may be serious and require treatment, has been reported with CNIs, including LUPKYNIS. Concomitant use of agents associated with hyperkalemia may increase the risk for hyperkalemia. Monitor serum potassium levels periodically.

QTc Prolongation: LUPKYNIS prolongs the QTc interval in a dose‑dependent manner when dosed higher than the recommended lupus nephritis therapeutic dose. The use of LUPKYNIS in combination with other drugs that are known to prolong QTc may result in clinically significant QT prolongation.

Immunizations: Avoid the use of live attenuated vaccines during treatment with LUPKYNIS. Inactivated vaccines noted to be safe for administration may not be sufficiently immunogenic during treatment with LUPKYNIS.

Pure Red Cell Aplasia: Cases of pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) have been reported in patients treated with another CNI immunosuppressant. If PRCA is diagnosed, consider discontinuation of LUPKYNIS.

Drug‑Drug Interactions: Avoid co‑administration of LUPKYNIS and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or with strong or moderate CYP3A4 inducers. Co‑administration of LUPKYNIS with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors is contraindicated. Reduce LUPKYNIS dosage when co‑administered with moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors. Avoid use of LUPKYNIS with strong or moderate CYP3A4 inducers.

ADVERSE REACTIONS

The most common adverse reactions (≥3%) were glomerular filtration rate decreased, hypertension, diarrhea, headache, anemia, cough, urinary tract infection, abdominal pain upper, dyspepsia, alopecia, renal impairment, abdominal pain, mouth ulceration, fatigue, tremor, acute kidney injury, and decreased appetite.

SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

Pregnancy: Avoid use of LUPKYNIS.

Lactation: Consider the mother’s clinical need of LUPKYNIS and any potential adverse effects to the breastfed infant when prescribing LUPKYNIS to a lactating woman.

Renal Impairment: LUPKYNIS is not recommended in patients with baseline eGFR ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m2 unless benefit exceeds risk. If used in this population, reduce LUPKYNIS dose.

Hepatic Impairment: For mild or moderate hepatic impairment, reduce LUPKYNIS dose. Avoid use with severe hepatic impairment.

Please see full Prescribing Information including Boxed Warning and Medication Guide for additional Important Safety Information about LUPKYNIS.